Does Abortion Kill?

There has been a bit of a back and forth between Newsweek writer George F. Will and Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer recently.

It began when George stated that, “It is theoretically impossible to fashion an abortion position more extreme than Boxer’s, which is slightly modified infanticide.” (Click here for full article)  He contends that her support of “partial birth abortions” also known as “late-term abortions” in cases where it would save the life or health of the mother is really just white washed support of infanticide.

Barbara wrote a polite letter in to Newsweek objecting to this projection, and stating that her words had been taken out of context.

Now, George is back, and this time he is waging a full on frontal assault, complete with a YouTube clip of Barbara’s words, in context and the proclamation that, “Her dilemma derives from the Supreme Court’s squeamishness in Roe V. Wade about a stark fact: Abortion Kills.”

But does it?  And isn’t this really at the heart of the whole abortion debate?  George states that every high school biology student knows when life begins.  Which is funny, because I firmly believe it happens after birth.  Before that, I agree with the Supreme Court of 1973, that it is only potential life.  Between conception and delivery a thousand things could happen, miscarriages, strangulation by the umbilical cord, drug overdose (yes, there are still crack, meth and heroin mommies out there), random fetal death, abusive boyfriends/husbands, premature birth resulting in an infant that is not viable, etc.

I don’t tell my kids we are having chicken for breakfast when I realize I’ve cracked a fertilized egg into the omelette.  It’s still just an egg.  Sure, it could have been a chicken, but, it isn’t.

When we go fishing and I catch a pregnant trout, I don’t go home boasting that I caught 100 fish.  Those other 99 were just potential fish.

When I think about abortions and pregnancy and choice and the “pro-life” team, I always come back to the idea that a fetus is really a lot like cancer.  It’s a cluster of rapidly dividing parasitic cells that feed off the woman’s body depleting her of vital nutrients and putting her life at risk. Luckily, for most people it is not a terminal cancer – instead it ends in the cancer expelling itself in the form of a viable human being.

So what about these controversial “partial birth abortions” that the “pro-lifers” are so up in arms about?

First, there are only about 5 doctors left in the country who will even perform these abortions (One of them having recently been assassinated by a “pro-lifer”, please excuse me while I choke on the irony…)  Second, about the only time these abortions take place is when the mother’s life or health is in serious jeopardy.  This type of abortion is not something that is taken lightly by anyone.  Are they killing infants? NO!  They are saving women.

In fact, despite the “pro-life” rantings to the contrary, I don’t know anyone who takes the idea of abortion lightly at all.  It’s not something people use as birth control.  It’s a very emotional and difficult decision.  But is it murder?  No, it’s not.  And that was the whole point of the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling and the supposed “squeamishness” of their argument.  They didn’t call it death, or killing, or murder, because it isn’t.

And that, fundamentally, is why women have the right to choose.  They have the right to choose how they want to live their lives and with how many children.  If we have to give up that right, then I say any man who gets a woman pregnant without her consent and then insists that she “suffer the consequences of HER irresponsible actions” should have his balls cut off to prevent future accidents.

See, men always seem to forget that women don’t just “get” pregnant.  Someone else makes them pregnant, and they are not always willing participants.  So, until the consequences of an unintended pregnancy are just as drastic for men as they are for women, the debate is rigged.

I am a happily married mother of two.  I have never had an abortion.  I got lucky.  Though I did use birth control until I was ready to have a kid, birth control is NOT 100% effective. (And, not everyone has access to it.)  Now that I have my two kids, I’m done.  My husband got his vasectomy when I was still 7 months pregnant with our 2nd child.  I do not plan on getting pregnant again, EVER.  So, if I do get pregnant, it will not be because of any irresponsibility on my part.  It will either be an act of nature finding a way (my husband’s vasectomy reversing itself), or the result of rape.  Either way, I will have an abortion.  I have made my choice.  I will not be ending a life, I will be preserving one.

It’s time we focused on the women who already exist and who are facing tough choices with or without an unplanned pregnancy, and less on the potential lives that may or not become people.

As my new favorite bumper sticker says, “If the fetus you save is gay, will you still support its rights?”

Advertisements

7 Comments

Filed under Of Course I'm a Feminist, Rant

7 responses to “Does Abortion Kill?

  1. Well done!!!! Truly children are people once they are born and even then I think we should give them a couple of months for their souls to attach cause nature happens even to good people.
    you rock,
    muz

  2. AA

    Trout eggs are fertilized by the papa fish in the water, not inside the mama fish. FYI.
    And to the broader point, I don’t understand how people, no matter how pro-choice, can not feel a bit disturbed about abortion. A fetus can start sucking its thumb at eleven weeks. To me that’s enought to feel squeamish about killing (sorry, un-lifeing) it.

    • thinkbannedthoughts

      AA –
      True about the fish, but I think the point still stands.
      If the people who were so concerned about every fetal life cared as much about actual people I’d probably give them more credence, but it seems to me that as soon as the fetus becomes an actual human they throw it to the wolves.
      By and large the same people who oppose abortion also oppose universal health care, education funding, wellfare and other “social justice” programs. Meanwhile they fully support defense spending, sending 18 year old boys off to fight insane wars, the death penalty, and other forms of unnatural population control.
      They often claim that God is in charge of life and it’s not our place to end it, then they go to fertility clinics when they can’t get pregnant, because apparently it’s OK for God to force a child on a woman, but it’s not OK for him to deny her one…
      Sorry, whole new rant.
      What I really meant to say was that I don’t think abortion is something anyone takes lightly. Not even the most pro-choice of pro-choice people. BUT if we start labeling it murder, and killing – then we won’t have that choice for much longer.

  3. Bill Clark

    The problem with the debate is the notion that life has beginnings and ending that are defined on an individual basis. Life is a line that goes all the way back to the primodial swamp that spawned the first replicating amino acids (sorry this may not be perfectly accurate, I’m not a biologist). Life is like chain lightening jumping from place to place, form to form, splitting, rejoining. The span of it’s beginning and end are much wider, MUCH wider than the span of a single lifetime. Unfortunately this comes into conflict with the very human, and dominently western notion of individuality. If we judge the zygote to be a human, just because of it’s potential, then we have to give the same status to every human cell with the DNA to replicate. Any action that took that knowingly resulted in the death of human cells would be murder. The list of obsurd qualifers is endless. Anyone for a Manslaughter charge because you knicked yourself shaving? That bundle of cells has huge potential, I agree, but until it has a reasonable chance of survival seperate from it’s mother then I believe that it is simply an extention of her. As such, it is subject to her decisions just the same as any other part of her own body.

  4. Pingback: No, you can’t have my rights. « ThinkBannedThoughts Blog

  5. Pingback: The importance of taking a stand | ThinkBannedThoughts Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s